- New House Majority PAC ad blasts Steve Southerland for forgetting the folks back home
- Court: US can withhold Guantanamo detainee images
- Scott calls militants ‘evil’ in journalist killing
- Mourners gather at Miami home of slain journalist
- U.S. Rep. David Jolly calls on NOAA to take action on red tide near Pinellas
- Steve Southerland finds himself on most endangered incumbents list
Could the Supreme Court rule against Obamacare, while keeping it in place?
As the Supreme Court weighs the constitutionality of the health insurance mandate in President Obama’s landmark law, Jonathan Cohn raises an interesting possible outcome first put forth by law professor Joey Fishkin.
The key is that the mandate to obtain insurance and the penalty for violating it are actually two separate sections in the health care law. “But if the Court determines that Congress has no power to impose the insurance requirement, Fishkin says, it can simply strike the requirement but leave the penalty in place. In other words, the law would no longer tell people to get insurance. Instead, it would merely tell people who don’t have insurance to pay a small fee to the government. On its own, Fishkin says, requiring such payment is a legitimate exercise of congressional taxing power.”
Via The Political Wire.