The inner-city upperclass and the hypocrisy of living in the suburbs

SHARE

Howard Husock reviews Alan Ehrenhalt’s The Great Inversion and the Future of the American City:

Its thesis is straightforward but not uncontroversial: that a large group of “millennial young adults” prefer urban over suburban, and especially exurban, living—and that, as a result, they will push lower-income households, including new immigrants, to settle outside core cities. This shift will re-create, to some extent, the pattern of early twentieth-century Vienna and Paris. In other words, the phrase “inner city,” long a synonym (and euphemism) for American social problems, will go the way of the Berlin Wall.

This book reinforces my long-held belief that living “downtown” is where one wants to be — and should be — even if you are raising a family.

That people live dozens of miles from a city core is ridiculous, especially when they want everyone’s tax dollars to pay for the roads to connect their suburban homes to the city core.  These are usually the same limited-government hypocrites who don’t want to pay a single cent more in taxes than they have to, except when those taxes would go to pave more roads.

Comments

comments

SHARE
Previous articleStill trying to understand the rules governing Steve Bousquet's alternative universe
Next articleThe asymmetrical tactics of drug trafficking
Peter Schorsch is the President of Extensive Enterprises and is the publisher of some of Florida’s most influential new media websites, including SaintPetersBlog.com, FloridaPolitics.com, ContextFlorida.com, and Sunburn, the morning read of what’s hot in Florida politics. SaintPetersBlog has for three years running been ranked by the Washington Post as the best state-based blog in Florida. In addition to his publishing efforts, Peter is a political consultant to several of the state’s largest governmental affairs and public relations firms. Peter lives in St. Petersburg with his wife, Michelle, and their daughter, Ella.